At a meeting of the stands, the statement of the sociologist Olga Krystanovskaya, who recently emerged from United Russia, sounded that in Russia it is obvious to approach the crisis of the legitimacy of the authorities, since people no longer trust the political institutions and the bureaucratic system clearly expressed there. The standphen position is possible while the system is like a card house. But I consider more common to find a solution to a decision of how to start the ruling class to comply with the expectations existing in society, ”Krystanovskaya noted. However, at the same time, the arguments and opponents of the law sounded. Mikhail Barshchevsky, the envoy of the government in the highest judicial echelon, said that the proposed restrictions are not consistent with the constitutional norm. In return, he put forward the initiative to introduce responsibility for concealing a declaration of foreign real estate.”Over the 12 years of being in power, I see a constant process of humiliation of civil servants. If the elites went on the occasion of society, they would still have to sit on the branches of the trees. If you receive a proposal to shoot governors after the completion of their powers, the company of most regions will support this, ”said Barshchevsky. Continuing, Barschevsky called this measure also “meaningless”, since the value of real estate in Russia exceeds foreign, however, it is not prohibited to acquire it to officials in Russia. Unicorn Andrei Makarov, chairman of the State Duma Committee on Budget and Tax Issues, noted that the ban on the acquisition of foreign assets will not be able to reduce the level of corruption. According to him, criminal liability cannot be introduced for actions or vice versa by the inaction of third parties, or for actions that are not particularly dangerous to the company. Regarding Makarov, this topic is just relevant for him: according to the declaration of last year, his wife and child own the site in Spain and the house with a total area of 318 square meters. m. After the performance of his colleagues, the word was given to Vyacheslav Lysakov, who cited the main arguments in defense of his own bill – this is an opinion on this matter of the head of state Putin and Prime Minister Medvedev that were absent in the discussion. The deputy recalled that they both supported the idea, but taking into account some reservations. Lysakov mentioned the problem of “double loyalty” that arises when a person is dependent on personal foreign assets. He explained that there is a big difference when buying an official of a house in Malakhovka or on a section of the southern coast of the country, which is in the NATO block. From the recent message of the leader of the United Russia party, Andrei Vorobyov, it is known that the consideration of the bill is planned for the period of the first reading in October. The second reading involves the possibility of making adjustments to its editor. For example, officials are likely to receive permission for modest real estate outside of Russia.